665mbs, get it here

Pretty impressive difference in performance taxation since the first one ( I ran Maxed out), but this one makes 800x600 (minimal settings) or 640x480 (maxed, minus features like Zfeather Smoke not supported) mandatory to be able to play at all on my config. Thanks for bumpin' this to us.. Can't wait to see the (superbly- mapped) graphics once I can reliably max out..

ED: - Heh, look at the post times! Just got back from school and realized I unwittingly posted exactly 12hrs after you! Interesting..

I found the graphics too be wierd, some things being VERY detailed, and some things...not at all. It IS a demo however, so hopfully the final version is better (my grpahics drivers could have been out of date, who knows).

Anyways, bump for the afternoon. Any fans of the original COD shoudl check this out!

I didn't like the gameplay in comparison to the original. This one seems too arcadey

That was REALLY lame. Somehow on max settings it looks worse than the original. Oh and it ran below 30fps on a 6800GT. And did I mention that it looks worse than the original? Gameplay was too confusing... I know there will always be people saying "its ww2 it was supposed to be intense!" well it takes away from the game. Did I hear what you were saying beside me? F*K NO! You can't hear sh*t. Anyways I don't see what they did to the game. It still features the same, dull AI, low-res textures and no physics or ragdolls. It's like they took the original, made a new level and updated one or two models... Wait no thats what they did do. Heh.

Gimme back my 650 megs of bandwidth (Larger than Half-Life1 and counter-strike combined)

[/rant]

i didnt find it that bad. it was pretty fun.

I did like the shorts and high socks the Brits were wearing. That made me laugh

Bump? Just incase people didn't know its out. Hasnt been advertised much at all that I know of.