hay can someone helo me out?
my wus arent showing up when they are complete on my folding sig thing, why not.

There's a lag on the sig and on the status server. Just take time, and if it persists, check the other answers for "my wus aren't updating" or whatnot

yeah, there is a heck of a lag on the sigs, at the F@H site its very quickly, sometimes it has taken a day or more on my sig

yeah, my sig hasnt udated for theasty few days as of now

Question: When running the f@h consule so you need to leave the cmd window open?

yes, but you can just minimize it, i love it cause for some reason my dock (object dock) doesnt pick it up so i dont have to think about it (i use object bar so there is no taskbar)

theres a reason i hate the console version, and dont use it

broke 75th yesterday and im at 74 (yesterday) watch out podium

BA - how many rigs you got folding? you go up like 5-10 wu's a day!!!

how many rigs you got?

me? i have 2, a dual proc 1.2 ghz hp and my new baby a 1700+ oced to 2.23

you just wait till i gert a new mobo and your puny AMD thing will be lying on the ground crying- man i love 2.4c's

bad choice to say AMD's are puny around here, just look at reds sig. AMD ALL THE WAY!!!!

and hey man dont be callin my baby an AMD "thing" im poor i cant afford your fancy 2.4c crap.

AMD is better performance for the bucks....

Yeah, AMD's reign at F@H, pound for pound.

And Dimazz, remember to run two version of the console with different processor ID in different folders.

well, my 160 dollar processor that outperforms the best XP which cost more than twice last i checked.... hmm- and hell, except for the 64s, is posiubly the best proc. around, and at least the best P4, but thats just me i guess

yes the 1700 is a VERY good value, but with its puny FSB you just cant get the memory scores to fully take adavnatage fo the speed

but yes, i knew i was asking to get flamed by saying i prefer intel

but the fact is, the 2.4c owns on a 1700 for price/performance since it will outperform almost anything in a price range nearly twice as much


EDIT
and i never said it would be better for F@H, i just said it owuld be better. F@H is not a good benchmark for much of anyhting, though the AMD archirtecture does pose a helluvalot of advantages for it and other things-

Umm... I'm talking about F@H, period. AMD's pwn at it. The FSB doesn't matter at all, it's pure processor power and the AMD's rock at floating point math operations, no way you can deny that.

Quote: Originally posted by jcarkeys Yeah, AMD's reign at F@H, pound for pound.

As per your post below. I said that a couple of messages before, no need for a new post

note the edit on my post, i'm just saying in general as a cpu- i know amd kills in f@h

jcarkeys read earlier in the thread i was askin how to do that and now got it going.

huh?

huh? ThereÂ’s a first-class chat room fashion post.

well lets see you explain dimazz's post

Quote: jcarkeys read earlier in the thread i was askin how to do that and now got it going.

I just wont say anything , you left yourself wide open for a wity comback on that lol