| |||||||
| Slashdot RSS RSS news feed directly from Slashdot. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| News Hound Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Floating among Data streams, waiting for the right moment
Posts: 44,023
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | kapaopango writes "Ars Technica is reporting that upgrade versions of Windows Vista Home Basic, Premium, and Starter Edition cannot be installed on a PC unless Windows XP or Windows 2000 is already installed. This is a change from previous versions of Windows, which only required a valid license key. This change has the potential to make disaster recovery very tedious. The article says: 'For its part, Microsoft seems to be confident that the Vista repair process should be sufficient to solve any problems with the OS, since otherwise the only option for disaster recovery in the absence of backups would be to wipe a machine, install XP, and then upgrade to Vista. This will certainly make disaster recovery a more irritating experience.'" More... |
| | |
| Sponsored Links |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Register // Windows Vista pricing favors PC upgrades | Gizmo | The Register RSS | 0 | 07-September-06 09:05 AM |
| The Register // Windows Vista pricing favors PC upgrades | Gizmo | The Register RSS | 0 | 06-September-06 11:05 AM |
| Ars Technica // Windows Vista to support upgrades on the fly | Gizmo | Ars Technica RSS | 0 | 01-March-06 01:42 PM |
| Ars Technica // Halo 2 on the PC? Yes, but it'll require Vista | Gizmo | Ars Technica RSS | 0 | 09-February-06 03:00 PM |
| Ars Technica // Microsoft to require signed drivers for 64-bit Vista | Gizmo | Ars Technica RSS | 0 | 01-February-06 05:00 PM |