| |||||||
| Slashdot RSS RSS news feed directly from Slashdot. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| News Hound Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Floating among Data streams, waiting for the right moment
Posts: 44,023
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Saqib Ali asks: "What are the best practices for managing Code Signing Digital IDs for Open Source projects, where the developers are dispersed throughout the globe? For our project there is NO central office, where we can secure the private key for the Code Signing Digital ID. Who should have the possession of the private key? Multiple people, or just the project manager? What Key Escrow (recovery) techniques can be used, in case the private key holder is not available? Who should be allowed to digitally sign the build? Currently one person handles the signing responsibility, but I think that is surely a single point of failure. Any thoughts/ideas?" http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?s...59217&from=rss |
| | |
| Sponsored Links |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Slashdot // Second Life To Open Source Server Code | Gizmo | Slashdot RSS | 0 | 19-April-07 02:00 PM |
| Slashdot // VBootkit Bypasses Vista's Code Signing | Gizmo | Slashdot RSS | 0 | 04-April-07 01:50 AM |
| Slashdot // Code Reading: The Open Source Perspective | Gizmo | Slashdot RSS | 0 | 09-March-05 01:04 AM |
| Slashdot // Open Source Code Maintainability Analyzed | Gizmo | Slashdot RSS | 0 | 15-February-05 11:57 PM |
| Slashdot // Open Xchange Server Source-code Released | Gizmo | Slashdot RSS | 0 | 30-August-04 03:00 PM |