Featured Worklog

Price Search



PC Apex Sponsor


PC Apex Sponsors



PC Apex RSS Feeds

RSS Feed for PC Apex Reviews & ArticlesRSS Feed for PC Apex PC Modding WorklogsRSS Feed for the PC Apex Daily DisturbanceRSS Feed for the latest PC Apex Site NewsRSS Feed for PC Apex Affiliate and Web NewsRSS Feed for PC Apex Deals and Steals

Go Back   Apex Community Forums // PC Apex Forums // PC Apex News // PC Apex Web News

PC Apex Web News News from our affiliates and other news sources.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28-February-08, 07:23 AM   #1 (permalink)
Apex Tech God
eascarface's Avatar
Default Affiliate Article:A look at mid-range graphics card memory size


A look at mid-range graphics card memory size
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Tech Report

When shopping for computer hardware, consumers tend to favor bigger numbers. I don't blame them, either. The average consumer knows about as much about hardware as I know about needlepoint, which is to say very little. Most, I would suspect, have no idea exactly what a megabyte is, let alone a gigahertz. But they can count, so when faced with the choice between 2GHz or 2.5GHz, they're going to go with the higher number. Because it's better.

Except when it's not, as was the case with the Pentium 4. Intel architected the P4 to scale to higher clock speeds than we'd ever seen before, birthing a megahertz myth that conveniently exploited consumer ignorance. Why would Joe Sixpack buy an Athlon at a mere 1.4GHz when he could get a Pentium 4 at 2GHz? Enthusiasts knew the score, but for years, mainstream consumers were easily persuaded?if they hadn't assumed already?that the Pentium 4 was a far better processor because it had a higher clock speed.

More recently, we've seen a much smaller but not less absurd memory myth take hold in the graphics card industry. Budget cards equipped with ridiculous amounts of memory are the culprit here. For enthusiasts, a gig of memory on a sub-$100 graphics card makes about as much sense as putting a spoiler on a Yugo. Budget GPUs lack the horsepower necessary to run games at the kinds of resolutions and detail levels that would require such a copious amount of video memory. But what about the latest crop of mid-range graphics cards? Nvidia's GeForce 8800 GT has considerable pixel-pushing power on its own, and when teamed in SLI, that power is effectively doubled. Perhaps a gigabyte of memory on this class of card isn't so unreasonable.

Conveniently, derivatives of the GeForce 8800 GT are available with 256MB, 512MB, or 1GB of memory, making it easy for us to probe the impact of graphics memory size on performance. We've tested a collection of single cards and SLI configurations in a selection of new games, across multiple resolutions, to see where memory size matters, if it does at all. Keep reading for the enlightening results.
Full Story at The Tech Report


eascarface is offline     Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Affiliate Article:Desktop Graphics Card Comparison Guide eascarface PC Apex Web News 0 17-January-08 07:14 AM
Affiliate Article:Workstation Graphics Card Comparison Guide Rev. 5.1. eascarface PC Apex Web News 0 20-December-07 11:23 AM
Affiliate Article:Desktop Graphics Card Comparison Guide Rev. 13.0 eascarface PC Apex Web News 0 13-December-07 09:56 AM
The Register // Club 3D unveils mid-range Radeon graphics card Gizmo The Register RSS 0 21-December-05 05:24 AM
Creative details ATI graphics card range Lokie PC Apex Web News 0 02-December-03 12:58 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright PCApex.com, GameApex.com, ForumApex.com 2001 - 2008
Advertisements

Page generated in 0.12167 seconds with 9 queries