Featured Worklog

Price Search



PC Apex Sponsor


PC Apex Sponsors



PC Apex RSS Feeds

RSS Feed for PC Apex Reviews & ArticlesRSS Feed for PC Apex PC Modding WorklogsRSS Feed for the PC Apex Daily DisturbanceRSS Feed for the latest PC Apex Site NewsRSS Feed for PC Apex Affiliate and Web NewsRSS Feed for PC Apex Deals and Steals

Go Back   Apex Community Forums // PC Apex Forums // PC Apex News // PC Apex Web News

PC Apex Web News News from our affiliates and other news sources.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14-February-08, 07:12 AM   #1 (permalink)
Apex Tech God
eascarface's Avatar
Default Affiliate Review:A sweet 16 mid-range graphics cards compared


A sweet 16 mid-range graphics cards compared
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Tech Report

We are living in perhaps the most exciting time in recent history for PC graphics. What's particularly striking about this latest flurry of excitement is that it isn't tied to a new standard in performance set by high-end "halo" cards that few enthusiasts can actually afford. Instead, it's being driven at an almost grassroots level, fueled by the class of graphics cards that most of us seem to end up actually buying?cards in the $200 range. These cards don't incite as much geek lust as those higher up the line, but they're far more attainable and often boast a better value proposition than the latest flagships.

I speak, of course, of the GeForce 8800 GT and Radeon HD 3800 series?the latest mid-range contenders battling for sweet spot supremacy. Launched not long ago and finally available with some semblance of consistency and adherence to prescribed pricing, these cards are selling like hotcakes. Given the fresh bounty of quality?and more importantly, demanding?PC titles we've been treated to over the last few months, it's no wonder gaming-worthy graphics cards are such a popular upgrade item.

If you've read our extensive coverage of the GeForce 8800 GT and Radeon HD 3800 series, you probably have an idea of which one best suits your needs and budget. That puts you one step closer to settling on the right card, but there's another important decision to consider: among the 8800 GTs and HD 3800-series cards available from various add-in board partners, which are the best? There's more variety here than one might think, since manufacturers tweak clock speeds, board layouts, cooling solutions, and even bundled games and extras in order to separate themselves from an increasingly crowded pack of contenders drawing from the same bin of chips.

Set on finding the finest mid-range graphics cards on the market, we've rounded up an appropriately sweet 16 cards from the likes of Asus, Gigabyte, HIS, MSI, Palit, PowerColor, Sapphire, VisionTek, XFX, and Zotac. Read on to see which set themselves apart from the masses.

Full Story at The Tech Report


eascarface is offline     Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Affiliated Review: Seven GeForce 8800 series graphics cards compared ranger1033 PC Apex Web News 0 15-February-07 03:34 PM
Affiliate Review: Three HDMI Graphics Cards Tested on LCD TV THRiLL KiLL PC Apex Web News 0 03-November-06 07:49 AM
Affiliate Review:ATI Radeon X1650PRO Graphics Cards Compared THRiLL KiLL PC Apex Web News 0 25-October-06 11:49 PM
Affiliate Review:ATI Radeon X1300XT Graphics Cards Compared THRiLL KiLL PC Apex Web News 0 17-October-06 01:31 AM
Affiliate Review: Running Folding@Home on ATI Graphics Cards THRiLL KiLL PC Apex Web News 0 10-October-06 08:29 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright PCApex.com, GameApex.com, ForumApex.com 2001 - 2008
Advertisements

Page generated in 0.11962 seconds with 9 queries