| | #1 (permalink) | |
| Apex Techie Lite | Im having trouble trying to figure out which CPU i want to buy.. both are AMD. 1. Model: Athlon 64 3200+ Core: Winchester Operating Frequency: 2.0GHz FSB: Integrated into Chip Cache: L1/64K+64K; L2/ 512KB Voltage: 1.5V Process: 90nm Socket: Socket 939 Multimedia Instruction: MMX, SSE, SSE2, 3DNOW!, 3DNOW!+ OR 2. Model: AMD Athlon 64 Core: Newcastle Operating Frequency: 2.2GHz FSB: Integrated into Chip Cache: L1/64+64KB; L2/512K Voltage: 1.5V Process: 0.13Micron Socket: Socket 939 Multimedia Instruction: MMX, SSE, SSE2, 3DNOW!, 3DNOW!+ $33 difference between the two. If the second choice is a shot better, id rather cough up the $33 to get it. | |
| | | |
| | #4 (permalink) | |
| You can read a good comparo over at BleedingEdge 90NM comes out on top by a nice margin http://www.bleedinedge.com/reviews/p...4/ap64_01.html | ||
| | | |
| | #5 (permalink) | |
| Winchester is hitting 2.71 on air all day, and the Newcastle tops out around 2.63 on air. Though I know someone who has got his newcastle to 2.7 gigs (AMD Socket 939 newcastle 3800+), but he has water cooling and some other nice hardware. Most 3200+ will top at 2.55 with the Newcastle, and 2.7 with the Winchester. Now that is not exactly what you will get, but it close. Last edited by SpikeShot; 24-December-04 at 09:08 PM.. | ||
| | | |
| | #8 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Difference in what exactly? They overclock better, use less power and run at lower temps. They are physically smaller as far as die size goes, but they are covered in a heatspreader so you won't exactly see it. Sometimes a different Bios is required for them to work with some motherboards...anything else? The link in my first post covers it pretty well, but if you want another, check this out. http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...oc.aspx?i=2242 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |