Featured Worklog

Price Search



PC Apex Sponsor


PC Apex Sponsors



PC Apex RSS Feeds

RSS Feed for PC Apex Reviews & ArticlesRSS Feed for PC Apex PC Modding WorklogsRSS Feed for the PC Apex Daily DisturbanceRSS Feed for the latest PC Apex Site NewsRSS Feed for PC Apex Affiliate and Web NewsRSS Feed for PC Apex Deals and Steals

Go Back   Apex Community Forums // PC Apex Forums // Tweaking // Internet / Network Tweaks

Internet / Network Tweaks Questions, info, results for internet/network tweaks.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25-February-07, 07:39 PM   #1 (permalink)
Apex Techie II
tetrafluoroethane's Avatar
Default paralleling NICs?

In a network setup, there is a server (running Windows Server 2003) connected to a Cisco Catalyst 2900XL switch. With the current prices of 10/100 NICs, is there a way to install several NICs in the server in order to increase bandwidth? If so, how? (I know that Linux supports this, but does Windows?)
tetrafluoroethane is offline     Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 26-February-07, 09:57 AM   #2 (permalink)
Apex Tech Maniac Supreme
PurpleDiamond's Avatar
Default Re: paralleling NICs?

I had to do something similar a long time ago and what I did (and I am not sure if it is the best solution, but it worked for me) was assign the IPs manually to each NIC, and manually add the IPs to the DHCP server. This was done in order to improve the file transfer performance on a file server.

This was done a windows domain with Windows 2003 servers. The DHCP server was the domain controller.
PurpleDiamond is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 26-February-07, 11:27 AM   #3 (permalink)
PCApex Review Editor
drougnor's Avatar
Default Re: paralleling NICs?

What also helps to eliminate the DHCP overhead is to assign different pc's to that server in the host file to specific IP address depending on what card you want them to access.

The place I used to work at had standard traffic going over one set of cards through the switches, and another set of cards was speciffically for the backup server to draw data across, theoretically eliminating bottlenecks. It worked most of the time, but a couple of the servers were old enough that the backup process would cause some heavy cpu load . . . kinda eliminated the benefits of the extra cards . . . But it did prevent work stalling out completely.

Another option that I learned about is if your switch IS equiped with the 1000 baseT port, buying the adaptor for your server is well worth it. The payout for getting 10x the bandwidth in one card gets you closer to making sure the only bottleneck in the system is the server itself vs the network load. And, unless you are going with DIRT cards on the 10/100 side, you'll almost always save money by buying that one 1000 baseT card than any combo of the others.

But that's my $.02.

D
drougnor is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 26-February-07, 03:01 PM   #4 (permalink)
Apex Techie II
tetrafluoroethane's Avatar
Default Re: paralleling NICs?

The switch does not have gigabit. A high quality gigabit switch costs $500 last time I checked so I'm not planning to upgrade anytime soon!
And I'd be happy with 200Mbps. I've heard of an option called "channel bonding" or "EtherChannel" or something like that. Can it be setup on Windows?
tetrafluoroethane is offline     Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright PCApex.com, GameApex.com, ForumApex.com 2001 - 2008
Advertisements

Page generated in 0.34914 seconds with 8 queries