Price Search



PC Apex Sponsor


PC Apex Sponsors




Go Back   Apex Community Forums // Game Apex Forums // Game Apex RSS News Feeds // Game Politics RSS

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-July-06, 07:45 PM   #1 (permalink)
News Hound
Gizmo's Avatar
Post GamePolitics Judge Extends Louisiana Restraining Order ...Criticizes Video Game Law During Hearing

Is it back to the drawing board for Jack Thompson?

Based on a breaking news report in the Shreveport Times, a Federal judge today seemed quite critical of Louisiana's new law which seeks to declare video game violence as harmful to minors. Thompson, the Miami attorney and anti-game activist, authored the Louisiana bill while assisting its sponsor, Rep. Roy Burrell.

Judge James Brady extended the temporary restraining order he issued on June 16th while he rules on today's request by the video game industry for an injunction.

According to the Times, Assistant Attorney General Burton Guidry and East Baton Rouge Parish District Attorney Doug Moreau argued that Louisiana already bans sales of alcohol, tobacco and pornography as items deemed harmful to minors.

"That's not speech," Judge Brady said from the bench. Although he did allow that the violence in some games is "horrible, but it's protected... Where is violence not protected (in the First Amendment)?"

"This is more than speech," said Assistant A.G. Guidry, sounding almost as if he had been prepped by Jack Thompson. "This is truly training for violence. You assume the character of a mass murderer. You go out and kill people as violently as you can because you score more points... (video game publishers) cloak themselves in free speech but under that cloak is murder, simulated murder."

Attorney Paul Smith (seen at left), representing the ESA and EMA, argued, "There is no violence exception in the First Amendment. It doesn't even come close to justifying censorship. You can't censor speech because it's going to lead people to do bad things... Video games are played every day by millions of people (who) don't go out and commit crimes," Smith said.

According to the newspaper report, Judge Brady will rule next week on whether or not to grant a preliminary injunction. Significantly, the Judge said that he saw no difference between the Louisiana video game law and a half-dozen others that have already been struck down around the country.

It's impossible to know how the judge will rule, of course, but today's comments from the bench do not bode well for Louisiana's violent video game law.

Want to talk about it? You can discuss this story via the "comments" feature (click below), or in the new GamePolitics Forums...



Link To Original Article

Gizmo is offline     Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright PCApex.com, GameApex.com, ForumApex.com 2001 - 2008
Advertisements

Page generated in 0.11021 seconds with 8 queries