Featured Worklog

Price Search



PC Apex Sponsor


PC Apex Sponsors



PC Apex RSS Feeds

RSS Feed for PC Apex Reviews & ArticlesRSS Feed for PC Apex PC Modding WorklogsRSS Feed for the PC Apex Daily DisturbanceRSS Feed for the latest PC Apex Site NewsRSS Feed for PC Apex Affiliate and Web NewsRSS Feed for PC Apex Deals and Steals

Go Back   Apex Community Forums // PC Apex Forums // PC Apex Site Content // Daily Disturbance

Daily Disturbance Articles from our entertaining editorial team.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-August-07, 07:43 AM   #1 (permalink)
Slightly Silly Moderator
Im_gumby's Avatar
Default Thank you Dr. Obvious.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AP
WASHINGTON - After exhaustively compiling a list of the 237 reasons why people have sex, researchers found that young men and women get intimate for mostly the same motivations. It's more about lust in the body than a love connection in the heart.

College-aged men and women agree on their top reasons for having sex — they were attracted to the person, they wanted to experience physical pleasure and "it feels good," according to a peer-reviewed study in the August edition of Archives of Sexual Behavior. Twenty of the top 25 reasons given for having sex were the same for men and women.

Expressing love and showing affection were in the top 10 for both men and women, but they did take a back seat to the clear No. 1: "I was attracted to the person."

Researchers at the University of Texas spent five years and their own money to study the overlooked why behind sex while others were spending their time on the how.

"It's refuted a lot of gender stereotypes ... that men only want sex for the physical pleasure and women want love," said University of Texas clinical psychology professor Cindy Meston, the study's co-author. "That's not what I came up with in my findings."

Forget thinking that men are from Mars and women from Venus, "the more we look, the more we find similarity," said Dr. Irwin Goldstein, director of sexual medicine at Alvarado Hospital in San Diego. Goldstein, who wasn't part of Meston's study, said the Texas research made a lot of sense and adds to growing evidence that the vaunted differences in the genders may only be among people with sexual problems.

Meston and colleague David Buss first questioned 444 men and women — ranging in age from 17 to 52 — to come up with a list of 237 distinct reasons people have sex. They ranged from "It's fun" which men ranked fourth and women ranked eighth to "I wanted to give someone else a sexually transmitted disease" which ranked on the bottom by women.

Once they came up with that long list, Meston and Buss asked 1,549 college students taking psychology classes to rank the reasons on a one-to-five scale on how they applied to their experiences.

"None of the gender differences are all that great," Meston said. "Men were more likely to be opportunistic towards having sex, so if sex were there and available they would jump on it, somewhat more so than women. Women were more likely to have sex because they felt they needed to please their partner."

But this is among college students, when Meston conceded "hormones run rampant." She predicted huge differences when older groups of people are studied.

Since her study came out Tuesday, people are coming up with new reasons to have sex.

"Originally, I thought that we exhaustively compiled the list, but now I found that there should be some added," Meston said.

I wonder where the following reason ranked: "Duh."

Link to the original study: http://tinyurl.com/ypzwvr

The most frightening response:
Quote:
"I wanted to give someone else a sexually transmitted disease" which ranked on the bottom by women.

This is terrible on a number of levels: the first is that some actually answered that... the second is that MORE THAN ONE PERSON ANSWERED THAT WAY!!!
Im_gumby is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 01-August-07, 08:46 AM   #2 (permalink)
Rob
Advocatus Diaboli
Rob's Avatar
Default Re: Thank you Dr. Obvious.

Well, still doesn't improve my chances any.

As a matter of fact, they've slimmed down some after I read this article.

Master P, what's going on down there?

LINK
Rob is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 01-August-07, 01:06 PM   #3 (permalink)
PCApex's Mom
lokies_mom's Avatar
Default Re: Thank you Dr. Obvious.

I think I have said this before, what pisses me off is, someone got paid for that.
DUHHHH, we are born horny. But I can't take that to the bank.

WE ARE BORN HORNY. Somebody pay me for my Obvious statement, please.
lokies_mom is offline     Reply With Quote
Old 02-August-07, 06:15 AM   #4 (permalink)
Apex Tech God
s1ugh34d's Avatar
Default Re: Thank you Dr. Obvious.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Im_gumby

This is terrible on a number of levels: the first is that some actually answered that... the second is that MORE THAN ONE PERSON ANSWERED THAT WAY!!!


Yes, but it didn't state anything about men saying that...


Yea we definately already knew that. I wish colleges would perform a worthwhile study, and not something like this or the affect of alcohol on the brain. Its all about what they want to talk about in class.

You know that teacher just wanted to get his students interested, sex is a easy topic...
s1ugh34d is offline     Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Slashdot // USPTO Examiner Rejected 1-Click Claims As "Obvious" Gizmo Slashdot RSS 0 15-May-07 06:50 AM
Ars Technica // Is it health care vs. high-tech in the war over obvious patents? Gizmo Ars Technica RSS 0 11-January-07 05:50 PM
Slashdot // Supreme Court to Rule On 'Obvious' Patents Gizmo Slashdot RSS 0 30-November-06 08:30 PM
Ars Technica // EFF hopes to make the "obviousness test" more obvious Gizmo Ars Technica RSS 0 24-August-06 01:00 PM
Ars Technica // Researchers discover the obvious: most Internet users overestimate security Gizmo Ars Technica RSS 0 25-October-04 03:47 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright PCApex.com, GameApex.com, ForumApex.com 2001 - 2008
Advertisements

Page generated in 0.16732 seconds with 9 queries