| |||||||
| Anything Goes Just like it says... anything goes. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| I found this article over at anandtech, it seems that Intel is changing their naming scheme once more, this time based primarily based on how much wattage each processor consumes. Sad to see the BMW naming scheme go, it was less than 18 months old (sarcasm). Too bad this one looks just as confusing, maybe even more so. Read on.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Register // AMD's chipset naming scheme: details emerge | Gizmo | The Register RSS | 0 | 17-November-06 09:47 PM |
| Slashdot // Intel Roadmap Update: The Art of Naming Processors | Gizmo | Slashdot RSS | 0 | 11-November-05 05:05 AM |
| The Register // Virus naming scheme gets mixed reception | Gizmo | The Register RSS | 0 | 07-October-05 03:55 AM |
| Slashdot // Intel says Internet needs to change | Gizmo | Slashdot RSS | 0 | 11-September-04 03:07 PM |
| Intel follows AMD in buffer flow protection scheme | Lokie | PC Apex Web News | 0 | 09-January-04 11:22 PM |