Saw this on fark, not sure what to make of it but this guy sounds pretty serious to me.

http://www.halturnershow.com/Chinese...AgainstUS.html

Back to work on the bomb shelter then?

Just the thing I wanted to see after coming home from work.

What do you expect from a communist government? Besides, Washington isn't building bunker nuclear bombs for nothing. We have nothing to worry about unless we're on a business trip.

You would think if this were actually a threat to us the government already knows about it.

I just don't see it happening, because if they did it would create WWIII when we and our allies retaliate and eliminate a few hundred million Chinese with nukes.

Crap, let's just do that now, that would solve their living space problem.

Quote: Originally Posted by Andrevas You would think if this were actually a threat to us the government already knows about it. I just don't see it happening, because if they did it would create WWIII when we and our allies retaliate and eliminate a few hundred million Chinese with nukes. Crap, let's just do that now, that would solve their living space problem.

Im with you

I don't know about that. I've heard the statistic that 50% of children in China are not getting atleast one of the bear necessities of life. Taking care of your own country would probably be a better idea than attacking one that's already in a war. (*cough* America vs. Iraq *cough*)

Im totally not touching the subject of war.
*backs away from thread*

I figured a lot of people were so i tried to stay away from offending anyone. Bush starts his support the war campain today.

Maybe this is going to be the nuclear holocaust or mass destruction that Nostradamus predicted...

Think ill marry a Chinese woman and emigrate to the yellow land...

Quote: Originally Posted by Spectrum Back to work on the bomb shelter then?

Ya..=/ Ya know...Just when I thought I could drink bear and I wont die from a nuclear attack..THIS happens..oh great! Looks like I should get started on hacking and overclocking those nukes...(along with the 100Ft by 100Ft bomb shelter..) Or we could always use an old nuke silo...

Eventually, everyone is going to attack the US, even the US will attack it self..

Heres to saying more retarded @ss sh!t that you have no clue about.........

Can't we all just get along?

I think the Chinese need to discover Bob Marley.

JAAAAAHHHHHHH RASTAFARI!!!!

EVERLIVING EVERFEARFUL EVERSURE SELASSIE THE FIRST!!!!

RASTAMAN!! JAAAHHHHHH RASTAFARI!!!!

Meh... I'm sure the US will invent a virus just as horrible, and it'll be the end of the human race...

I'm sure whatever species comes after us will probably find it all highly amusing...

in all seriousness, chaina cant do anythign except drop nukes on us.



while they have millions of troops, the fact they wont be able to get those troops on US soil without us knowing about.

thier navy is at best, laughable.
same goes for thier air force.

basicly, they dotn stand a chance

I'm sorry to say this but they would be dumb as dirt if they were to try something like this. This may be a little bit of my American pride showing but heck. I doubt there is a country anywhere that could take us out by themselves. Forget Nato (crybabies) we could take any one nation, any-time, any-where. Forget nukes, they just wreck the planet for everyone else. It should be a no holds bared, classic butt woopin. Something the likes that hasn't been seen for a very long time. All of these other countries around the world seem to think that the USA is weak and isn't a threat any more. They really need put in their place, get the thumb sucking polititians out of office, stop listening to what Nato wants us to do, and kick a couple countries off the face of the earth.

Dang that new chocolate Lucky Charms is good, what do you all think?

Lucky Charms taste like monkey-butt.

I prefer Raisin Bran and Cinnamon Toast Crunch.

Are you sure that wasn't the Red Assed Baboon that sat on your face while you were sleeping?

Quote: Originally Posted by WDoG I don't know about that. I've heard the statistic that 50% of children in China are not getting atleast one of the bear necessities of life. Taking care of your own country would probably be a better idea than attacking one that's already in a war. (*cough* America vs. Iraq *cough*)

Well ****, I mean if if that's the way your gonna think lets see you poney up and help out...I'm sorry but ever since 2003 all I've heard is Bush bad, War bad, constructivism good, Warmonger...etc. But it's all talk, what would you do different, and remember it's either appeasement or inaction.

Quote: Originally Posted by WDoG I figured a lot of people were so i tried to stay away from offending anyone. Bush starts his support the war campain today.

You really didn't stay away from it at all it was the last thing in your first statement, you seemed to look for a way to bring it into the conversation, so let's conversate.

I propose that the money you spent on your glasses we'd use to feed the starving kids in my neighborhood. Ohh wait you didn't mean taking care of your own country with your money, I'm sorry. For a country that tried to assasinate our president for protecting an invaded country I have little sympathy for the Bath party of Iraq, or for that matter Syria and Jordan either. Helping others is actually a much more honorable form of proactivity as opposed to helping yourself. I'll leave the issue of Iraq behind now and get back on topic until you throw your 2 cents in again.

As for the issue of China I'd have to say that they are the most disturbing people in the world at the moment. Not since listening to the speeches of Hitler have i heard such rhetoric from a person. He's justifying mass murder and genocide in order to propigate the yellow people. Hey I'm all for the propigation of the "yellow people" in fact they are some of my best friends in real life, but I'd rather not have a Chinesse hardliner frothing up the already failed communist war machine. Facism was horrible but when you mix that with ethnic hatred and socialism you get something far more disturbing then what Hitler proposed.

Let's go back to Iraq/Afghanistan for just a moment. At the beginning of this millenium Russia, China, Afghanistan and Iraq were working together to pool their resources and mapping out a plan to topple Western interests in Europe. Osama Bin laden beat them to the punch and blew his load prematurely, because he had chosen Afghanistan as his homebase he brought the wrath of the western world upon the Taliban in what could be considered the most successful military opperation in Western history. Iraq is a strategic move. Whatever you think about their future as a people, Sadam Hussein didn't have to be attempting nuclear weapons (which he was) he was training two sons who were more ruthless then he to take his place. Innocent countries including Israel and Kuait would have been continually attacked through your lifetime and well into your grandchildren's had something not been done to remove him from power.

If you paid any attention to the news for the past 10 years (i know it's hard you being only 19 and too involved with looking cool) you'd realize that Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria are major fronts for testing and purchase of Russian and Chinesse goods and weapons. When America took it upon itself to "start" a democracy in Iraq and Afghanistan most of the UN leaders and countries did not want to follow suit no matter how committed they were to democracy or the cessation of violence because of the threat of economic sanctions that came from France, Germany, Russia, China and North Korea. Turkey is a good example, they are still neutral because of shear ammount of goods that they import to stay afloat as a country. Turkey will benefit no matter what happens given its location and its neutrality.

Again if you consider everything the Cold War has never really ended. The countries that "aim" to take control of American and Western interests have become so dependent on money and symbiotic-economic relationships that any kind of direct military action, such as the ones that our militaristic friend in the article above described, would lead to a crash backwards in economic and moral achievments of about 50-60 years.

I really don't like the idea of a War in Iraq or Afghanistan just because I'd rather not see innocents hurt or endangered in any way. But speaking strategically America has been taking out bishops, rooks and kinghts in an effort to spare the pawns of this world.

I wouldn't suggest you read the sources that I read for information or relly solely on sources like the one above, but WDog you really need to broaden your sources of information. Read, read, read. When it comes to something this important SCREW the internet and go to a library and just read about what's happend in the past and what's worked and saved lives in the past. The more you spout propaganda like your two posts above the more you make people believe that there is no such thing as evil, no problems to worry about, and no reason why they should feed the poor, or help the week.

Just think what would have happend had the north not decided to go to war with the south almost 240 years ago. Sometimes innaction can not stand in the face of attrocities and instead you have to make a choice to fight those who bring injustices to the world even if it means cutting off a limb or sacrificing for the greater good.