AMD 65NM first OC results!

$SOLID$ Necro · 14-December-06, 12:37 AM

Well..the launch of the AMD 65NM cores (Brisbane) came and went without hardly anyone blinkng an eye, no reviews were posted by any of the major sites since AMD didn't bother sending out review samples.

For those who weren't expecting much from them, well...the initial results don't seem bad OC wise, but performance wise they are still no match for Intel Core 2 Duo (No suprise since it was just a die shrink and no changes to the core)

3.1GHZ, using an AMD FX stock cooler..not bad at all!

Brisbane Testing in progress... - XtremeSystems Forums

MaTtsPc · 14-December-06, 01:18 AM

It's looking good solid! I wanna see like 3.5Ghz with it tho!! Think you can get it? Hows the heat issuse?

Matt

Zaltan · 14-December-06, 04:00 AM

Yeah, would have been nice if they were getting to 3.5GHz+.

eascarface · 14-December-06, 04:22 AM

Wow. That looks pretty sick. I would think that 4.5 and over could be had with LN2 maybe? Maybe even higher with the second revision?

Zaltan · 14-December-06, 04:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eascarface


	Wow. That looks pretty sick. I would think that 4.5 and over could be had with LN2 maybe? Maybe even higher with the second revision?

I doubt it, the 'cold bug' would probably be worse with the small die. I reckon 4GHz max benchable, which would not be a good as say a 3.8GHz E6600 on air.

s1ugh34d · 14-December-06, 11:56 AM

The major difference is 1.384 vcore, 3.1 GHZ with a near stock vcore, thats where these are gonna perform, strange no one got any engineering samples for reviews.

But i hope they do good with the X2's i want a 65nm 4400+, could be nice chip, being that a noctua will be cooling it and microATX case will be holding it.

14-December-06, 12:37 AM		#1 (permalink)
$SOLID$ Necro Mastah Overclocker	AMD 65NM first OC results! Well..the launch of the AMD 65NM cores (Brisbane) came and went without hardly anyone blinkng an eye, no reviews were posted by any of the major sites since AMD didn't bother sending out review samples. For those who weren't expecting much from them, well...the initial results don't seem bad OC wise, but performance wise they are still no match for Intel Core 2 Duo (No suprise since it was just a die shrink and no changes to the core) 3.1GHZ, using an AMD FX stock cooler..not bad at all! Brisbane Testing in progress... - XtremeSystems Forums Attached Thumbnails

14-December-06, 01:18 AM		#2 (permalink)
MaTtsPc Apex Tech God	Re: AMD 65NM first OC results! It's looking good solid! I wanna see like 3.5Ghz with it tho!! Think you can get it? Hows the heat issuse? Matt

14-December-06, 04:00 AM		#3 (permalink)
Zaltan Apex Tech God	Re: AMD 65NM first OC results! Yeah, would have been nice if they were getting to 3.5GHz+.

14-December-06, 04:22 AM		#4 (permalink)
eascarface Apex Tech God	Re: AMD 65NM first OC results! Wow. That looks pretty sick. I would think that 4.5 and over could be had with LN2 maybe? Maybe even higher with the second revision?

14-December-06, 11:56 AM		#6 (permalink)
s1ugh34d Apex Tech God	Re: AMD 65NM first OC results! The major difference is 1.384 vcore, 3.1 GHZ with a near stock vcore, thats where these are gonna perform, strange no one got any engineering samples for reviews. But i hope they do good with the X2's i want a 65nm 4400+, could be nice chip, being that a noctua will be cooling it and microATX case will be holding it.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Ars Technica // PS3 and the 360: The race to 65nm	Gizmo	Ars Technica RSS	0	05-February-07 03:00 PM
Testing AW8 + 65nm Celeron.	Zaltan	Intel CPU/Motherboard OC	10	23-January-07 04:30 PM
90nm vs. 65nm chips	Wafflesomd	Anything Goes	13	31-May-06 02:01 PM
65nm P4's	Zaltan	Intel CPU/Motherboard OC	3	09-February-06 04:45 PM
Anandtech // Intel 65nm and Beyond (or Below)	Gizmo	Anandtech RSS	0	09-September-04 03:04 PM